Editorial Process ────── Revision 03 — January 2026

Editorial Standards

Golnev Almanac operates under the following editorial principles: articles are reviewed by at least one second editor before publication, sources are cited where appropriate, corrections are noted publicly, and writers disclose any commercial relationships that could influence their selection of subject matter.

01

Core principles

Source Integrity

Published research, not assertion

Claims about the relationship between sleep, energy balance, and body composition are grounded in published nutritional research and peer-reviewed studies. Writers are required to identify the source of any quantitative claim at the draft stage. Where a study is cited, the publication, author, and year are retained in the editorial file, available on request.

Two-Editor Review

No article passes through a single reader

Every piece submitted to the almanac is reviewed by at least one editor other than the writer before publication. The second editor checks for accuracy, register, stop-word compliance, and the presence of any unsupported assertions. Changes required at this stage are recorded in the revision log attached to each article file.

Disclosure

Commercial relationships declared

Writers disclose any commercial relationships — brand affiliations, sponsored research, paid consultancy — that could influence their selection of subject matter or their framing of a topic. Where a relationship exists, it is noted at the foot of the relevant article. The almanac accepts no advertising and holds no commercial relationships with product manufacturers.

Corrections Policy

Errors acknowledged in public

Where a factual error is identified after publication, the correction is noted at the foot of the article with a date and brief explanation. The original text may be preserved with a strikethrough, or replaced, depending on the severity of the error. The almanac does not silently amend published articles.

02

From pitch to publication

Step 01

Pitch & Framing

Every article begins as a short pitch — typically 150 to 200 words — that identifies the specific observational question the piece will address. The founding editor assesses each pitch against three criteria: is the question grounded in the publication's subject area, does it avoid the specialist and urgency registers the almanac does not use, and is there a substantive body of published research the writer can draw from?

Pitches that propose "how to" framings, numbered-list articles, or topics centred on rapid change are returned with a suggested reframing toward the observational mode. The almanac does not publish prescriptive programmes.

Step 02

Draft & Source File

Writers submit a full draft alongside a source file — a simple document listing each published study, journal article, or reference text cited in the piece. The source file need not be formatted in any academic style; it must simply identify the work clearly enough for the second editor to locate it independently.

Content published by Golnev Almanac is selected based on published nutritional research and undergoes editorial review for quality and accuracy. The almanac does not commission articles based on commercial arrangements with any wellness product or service provider.

Step 03

Second-Editor Review

The second editor reads the draft without reference to the source file, making notes on any passages that make quantitative or comparative claims without apparent basis. These notes are returned to the writer for source clarification or revision.

The second editor also checks register: the almanac does not publish copy in the marketing-imperative mode, in the urgency register, or in language that implies the piece is a directive rather than an observation. Any such passages are flagged for rewriting at this stage.

Step 04

Revision & Sign-Off

After revisions are made, the founding editor performs a final read and signs off. At this stage, the article receives a publication date, an author bio confirmation, and a category tag. The revision log is closed and filed.

Sign-off is recorded with the date and the initials of both editors. Articles signed off more than eight weeks before publication are reviewed again at the week of publication, to ensure that no published research has emerged in the interim that would alter the framing.

Step 05

Publication & Monitoring

Published articles are monitored for reader correspondence that flags factual concerns. Where a concern is substantiated after review, the corrections policy (see above) is applied. The almanac's publication record — including all corrections — is considered part of the editorial archive.

Readers who identify what they believe to be an error are encouraged to write via the contact form, selecting "Editorial Enquiry" as the subject. All such correspondence is reviewed by the founding editor personally.

03

Subject matter & sourcing

What the almanac covers

The almanac focuses on the relationship between sleep quality and the long-term management of body composition. This covers: the mechanics of sleep architecture as they relate to energy regulation; the role of circadian rhythm in appetite signalling; the effects of consistent rest-day scheduling on portion awareness and daily energy balance; and the practical habits — evening routines, bedtime windows, morning anchors — that practitioners observe making a measurable difference over time.

The almanac does not cover rapid weight-loss programmes, extreme dietary restriction, performance supplementation, or any subject area that would require engagement with the vocabulary of immediate specialist outcomes. These topics are outside the publication's scope as a matter of editorial policy, not merely of regulatory caution.

Editorial desk with open notebooks, printed journal articles with yellow highlighter marks, and a cup of tea in a quiet workspace under warm studio lighting

fig. 03 — Editorial review in progress, W1F

04

Verification summary

Research Sourcing

All quantitative claims are traced to published peer-reviewed literature. Practitioners' observational notes are distinguished from research findings within the text. The two categories are not conflated.

Independence

Golnev Almanac is an independent editorial publication. It accepts no advertising revenue, holds no brand sponsorships, and has no commercial relationship with any wellness product or supplement manufacturer. Editorial decisions are made without commercial input.

Scope Limitation

Articles are editorial in nature and reflect the writers' observations on everyday wellness practices. The content is not intended as professional advice, nor as guidance for the management of any specific condition. Readers with specific concerns are encouraged to speak with a qualified wellness professional.

05

Questions about editorial practice

Readers, researchers, and practitioners who have questions about the almanac's editorial approach, sourcing standards, or publication process are welcome to write to the editorial team directly. The founding editor reads all such correspondence.

Contact the Editorial Team About the Publication

Quick reference

Two-editor review before publication
Sources cited and filed per article
Commercial relationships disclosed publicly
Corrections noted at foot of article
No advertising or product sponsorships
Independent of all commercial bodies